Search DominoPower's 11,441 Lotus-related article archive 
Home
EasyPrint
News details Click here for the RSS feed's XML code. This is not a browser URL.
Articles-only Click here for the RSS feed's XML code. This is not a browser URL.
Twitter Feed Click here for the Twitter feed.
The White House email controversy: an archiving plan only FEMA could love (continued)

Perhaps Perino's comment here will shed some light on the question:

That is true at the White House for EOP accounts. I can't speak to any other organization, or their policies, although we are trying to work with the RNC to understand their policy.

So far, the White House has acknowledged that some messages may be missing from government-run servers. But there's no specific detail on whether the political email has been archived, is missing, or what.

But then we hit an interesting "whoops" in the road. According to Perino, apparently the RNC emails were deleted every 30 days up until 2004!

As I said, anyone with those emails here, as I understand it, since 2004, those emails have been separated from an RNC policy which is to automatically delete every 30 days deleted emails. So we have worked to try to be both in coordination and compliance with the Hatch Act, as well as the Presidential Records Act.

There is no way this isn't going to be painful to wrap your head around. Further in Perino's briefing, she discusses an issue of "double-deleting". It's just easier if I let her tell you about it:

Q How does that square with what Scott Stanzel was saying this morning, where he was saying that staffers could, so-called, double-delete?
MS. PERINO: That is true. When I say that we're trying to find if there were any potential emails that were not captured in that system, if someone had the capability to -- if they wanted to clean out their inbox -- delete a message, and then when your inbox -- when your deleted box fills up, and you decide that you want to clean that up, if you delete that one, as well, where did those emails go? And that's exactly what we're trying to find out.
Q A couple minutes ago you were saying that for sure since 2004 it's been archived, though. But I'm trying to understand, with the double-delete, can that override the archiving?
MS. PERINO: I think that it might be able to. And I can't speak to any individual's personal email habits, but let me -- I'm not a technical expert, so let me make sure we find that.
Q If it could override it, then what you said earlier about it's archived since 2004 may not be true, because it could be double-delete -- some of the emails could be --
MS. PERINO: Let me look into the specific technical pieces of that.

Unfortunately, the White House briefing transcripts don't record who's asking the questions. But at least we're seeing Ms. Perino's answers. And, if I'm reading this correctly, she's saying emails might be archived, and if they're archived, they could be deleted later, if someone deletes mail from his or her Deleted Items folder.

Best practice archiving and the Deleted Items folder
Let's dive into this for a moment. If you're going to use best-practices to set up an email archiving solution, the solution would grab email messages as they transit the server.

Anything going in or out through the SMTP server would be archived to a central hard drive, which, every so often, should be backed up. There should be no way for a user on the network to delete or "double-delete" a message that exists on the archive server. In fact, there should be no way for a user to have any access whatsoever on the archive server.


« Previous  ·  1  ·  2  ·  3  ·  4  ·  5  ·  6  ·  Next »
Other articles you might like
Home > Special Reports > White House email controversy (25 articles)
   Analysis: Spying Chinese temptress steals senior Brit's BlackBerry
   U.S. government agencies' cyber-security and record-keeping worse than previously thought
   The White House email controversy: it's time for a Special Prosecutor
Get Weekly Email Updates
Subscribe to our regular weekly email newsletter. It's packed with tips, reviews, deep analysis, and the latest news.
 
Recent DominoPower Articles
Application development, William Shatner, and the origin of the universe
Learn Domino Designer 8.5 for free
The (near) future of Sametime, Quickr, Connections, and Symphony
Inside the IBM Innovations lab
Lotusphere 2010: Hot fixes and cool news for Notes, Domino, and LotusLive
Lotusphere 2010: mobility and collaboration
2010: A Lotusphere of change
Latest Lotus Headlines
Xpages not loading? JVM errors? - Solution
How to implement an iCalendar feed into your Notes calendar with XPages
DWA Hotfixes for Domino 8.5.1FP1 - A Gotcha
IBM Adds DB2 to Lotus Foundations SMB Package
SNTT : XPages onclick Ghosts in the machine
Ports used by Lotus Sametime 8.5 servers
Exploring a Domino Date Bug
>> Read all the news
More from the ZATZ journals
Computing Unplugged: The iPad defenders have spoken
David Gewirtz Online: CNN commentary and analysis
OutlookPower: More about disappearing text
-- Advertisement --

Sophisticated Meets Simple For Document Management
Share. Control. Manage.
Documents, emails, and content in the context of how work is done. Native to Lotus Domino. The User Experience unseen for Lotus Domino. Do more with less. Really.

See the possibilities Docova unleashes for Lotus Domino.
-- Advertisement --

Integrate your Notes Applications with Microsoft Office and Symphony
Integra for Notes Integrates Microsoft Office and/or IBM Lotus Symphony
Requires NO change to the design of the appliation or Installations of DLL's and EXE's
  • Integra is a ready to use solution, enhance static reports with Excel data analysis, pivot tables, macros
  • User friendly aproach, using a point and click access to features
  • Reports from any Lotus Notes databases
  • Runs reports through a Notes client, web browser and scheduled basis
  • Allows use of LotusScript for advanced data manipulation
  • Enables self service reporting capabilities to end-users


Learn more at www.integra4notes.com.
ZATZ Home  ·  News  ·  Back Issues  ·  Credits/Trademarks ·  Link To Us
Copyright © 1998-2010, ZATZ Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide.
Editor's Login