Search DominoPower's 11,441 Lotus-related article archive 
Home
EasyPrint
News details Click here for the RSS feed's XML code. This is not a browser URL.
Articles-only Click here for the RSS feed's XML code. This is not a browser URL.
Twitter Feed Click here for the Twitter feed.
The White House email controversy: get ready for the hearings (continued)

Consistent with industry best practices relating to tape media management for disaster recovery back-up systems, these tapes were recycled prior to October 2003.

To those plaintiffs looking for records of email messages earlier than 2003, Ms. Payton seems to be implying they've been "recycled" -- in other words, they're gone. Or, at least that's the take-away the press seems to be reporting.

Any network engineer knows there's always old hard drives sitting around, spare image copies of things, powered-down servers sitting in a closet gathering dust, and so forth. So while the tapes may have been overwritten, I think there's still the chance the data being sought is out there somewhere.

"The plot thickens. More messages might be missing. Or they might not. Confused yet?"

The plot thickens. More messages might be missing. Or they might not. If you listened to the White House in September, messages are missing. But if you talk to the White House now, there are no messages missing. Confused yet?

Back on September 19, 2007, a White House official showed staffers of the United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform a chart, according to a letter (PDF) from Chairman Henry A. Waxman to Counsel to the President Fred F. Fielding:

At this briefing, the White House showed staff a chart indicating that there were 473 days for which various entities in the Executive Office of the President had no archived emails. According to the chart. the davs with no archived emails included:
For the White House Office: December 17, 2003, December 20, 2003, December 21, 2003, January 9, 2004, January 10, 2004, January 11, 2004, January 29, 2004, February 1, 2004, February 2, 2004, February 3, 2004, February 7, 2004, and February 8, 2004.
For the Office of the Vice President: September 12, 2003, October 1, 2003, October 2, 2003, October 3, 2003, October 5, 2003, January 29, 2004, January 30, 2004,January 31, 2004, February 7, 2004, February 8, 2004, February 15, 2005, February 16, 2005, February 17, 2005, May 21, 2005, May 22, 2005, May 23, 2005.
For the Council on Environmental Quality: 8l days, including the entire period between November 1, 2003 through January 1, 2004.
For the Council of Economic Advisers: 103 days, including the entire period between November 2, 2003 through January 11, 2004.
For the Office of Management and Budget: 59 days, including the entire period befween November 1, 2003 through December 9, 2003.
For the U.S. Trade Representative: 73 days, including the entire period between February 11, 2004 through April 18, 2004.

What's making investigators crazy, however, is a White House assertion on Thursday January 17, 2008 by White House Deputy Press Secretary Salvatore Antonio Fratto that "We have absolutely no reason to believe that any emails are missing," a complete contradiction of the September 19th presentation.


« Previous  ·  1  ·  2  ·  3  ·  4  ·  Next »
Other articles you might like
Home > Special Reports > White House email controversy (25 articles)
   Analysis: Spying Chinese temptress steals senior Brit's BlackBerry
   U.S. government agencies' cyber-security and record-keeping worse than previously thought
   The White House email controversy: it's time for a Special Prosecutor
Get Weekly Email Updates
Subscribe to our regular weekly email newsletter. It's packed with tips, reviews, deep analysis, and the latest news.
 
Recent DominoPower Articles
Application development, William Shatner, and the origin of the universe
Learn Domino Designer 8.5 for free
The (near) future of Sametime, Quickr, Connections, and Symphony
Inside the IBM Innovations lab
Lotusphere 2010: Hot fixes and cool news for Notes, Domino, and LotusLive
Lotusphere 2010: mobility and collaboration
2010: A Lotusphere of change
Latest Lotus Headlines
Xpages not loading? JVM errors? - Solution
How to implement an iCalendar feed into your Notes calendar with XPages
DWA Hotfixes for Domino 8.5.1FP1 - A Gotcha
IBM Adds DB2 to Lotus Foundations SMB Package
SNTT : XPages onclick Ghosts in the machine
Ports used by Lotus Sametime 8.5 servers
Exploring a Domino Date Bug
>> Read all the news
More from the ZATZ journals
Computing Unplugged: The iPad defenders have spoken
David Gewirtz Online: CNN commentary and analysis
OutlookPower: More about disappearing text
-- Advertisement --

Learn Notes and Domino 8 at your place and pace!
Learn Notes and Domino in your office and/or home! TLCC's highly acclaimed distance learning courses for users, developers, and admins will enhance your career and your resume.

The many included activities and demos will make you a pro! Expert instructor help is a click away.

Click here to try a FREE demo course!!

-- Advertisement --

Mark your calendar for in-depth Lotus training, May 12-14, Boston
Join experts and peers May 12-14 in Boston for educational and networking events that deliver real-world Lotus training so you can increase productivity and efficiency in your company, advance your skills, and squeeze the most from your current environment. One registration gets you into THE VIEW's Admin2010 and Lotus Developer2010.

Register by April 10 to save $200.
ZATZ Home  ·  News  ·  Back Issues  ·  Credits/Trademarks ·  Link To Us
Copyright © 1998-2010, ZATZ Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide.
Editor's Login